Eighties Architecture

What the hell were they thinking?
What made them think that they were going to produce a piece of architecture with lasting lengevity, even though it looks like a piece of Lego?
Well, after reading an article from blog.davidteoh.com/
It was an attempt to glorify the materials used in producing such a building.
In most ugly structures such as the one illustrated in the picture I've borrowed from said blog, the architect was supposed to be glorifying the materials used to build it by making them the main point of the design.
That is one hell of a schoolboy error.
Asking Joe Public to appreciate a building as art when all you've effectively done is take the shine off of it is always going to be a big ask.
People are critical of modern architecture anyway.
"It's too glassy". "It's not glassy enough. I like glass". "It's leaning too far to the left". "It looks phalic".
Nobody's happy with every building they see.
I think that there's something to be said about old school building design and producing breathtaking structures that still appeal to the general public and inspire photographers on a daily basis.
The BBC have just released a magazine article on this very subject. Have a read for some more information.
Labels: architecture, artist, brutal, church, eighties

